Resources 16 Figure 6: Country estimates of the total annual investment (US$) being made by other public or private organizations, agencies or departments (non-appo) to conduct pest surveillance in the country? 13 Figure 5: Responses to the question what is the total annual investment currently being made by the NPPO to conduct Pest Surveillance (US$)? 13 Figure 8: Country rating of the current pest surveillance programme of NPPOs in terms of human resources capacity with regard to qualifications and skills 14 Figure 7: Country rating of the sufficiency of other resources (vehicles, traps, lures, samplers, GPS, etc.) required to operate the pest surveillance programme 14 Figure 10. Specific surveys 13 Figure 2: Country ratings of the sufficiency of resources required for general pest surveillance 10 Figure 1: Responses to the question what proportion of plant pest records can be verified from insect or culture collections? 10 Figure 3: Responses to the question How many plant species or plant products grown in the country are officially surveyed for pests on a regular basis? 10 Figure 4: Responses to the question what are agreements between NPPO and public institutions covering expenditures for specific surveys, surveys related to outbreaks, surveys related to PFAs, ALPPS, etc? 11 F. ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE, COMPETENCES AND CULTURE 10 C. 6 (1997): GUIDELINES FOR SURVEILLANCE 8 BACKGROUND 8 SCOPE OF THE QUESTIONNAIRE 9 A. 1 IMPLEMENTATION REVIEW AND SUPPORT SYSTEM Review of the Implementation of ISPM-6 Challenges and Best Practices International Plant Protection Convention (IPPC) Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations Via delle Terme di Caracalla Rome, Italy March 2012ΔΆ Implementation Review and Support System (IRSS) ii Contents ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS VI REPORT ON ACTIVITY CARRIED OUT FOR ISPM NO.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |